top of page

The BUILD Framework: What I've Learned from Students Who Reached MIT, Cornell, and Other Top Universities

  • Writer: Anushka Goyal
    Anushka Goyal
  • Jun 19
  • 6 min read

For almost a decade now I've worked closely with high school students every day at BetterMind Labs. Some of them come in with big dreams and very clear goals and some are still figuring out who they are and what they care about.


Anushka Goyal - Director of Programs @ BetterMind Labs The students want to become researchers, build companies. Some are drawn to artificial intelligence. And some simply know they want to do something meaningful, even if they cannot yet name exactly what that looks like.

What has stayed with me over the years is not just the work they produce, but the way they think while they are producing it.


Students listen as Anushka Goyal points at a wall covered with yellow sticky notes and handwritten notes in a hallway.

I have spent countless hours in brainstorming sessions, mentorship calls, project reviews, and conversations with students, parents, college counselors, and educators. And through all of that, I kept coming back to one question:


What actually separates the students who stand out from everyone else?

At first, like many people, I thought the answer would be something obvious. Maybe it was intelligence. Maybe it was confidence. Maybe it was access to the right opportunities. Maybe it was starting earlier than everyone else or having a stronger résumé on paper.

But the more closely I worked with students who built real projects, pursued meaningful research, and eventually earned admission to places like MIT, Cornell, and other highly selective universities, the more I realized that the answer was much deeper than that.

The students who stood out rarely began with the strongest résumé.

They began with the strongest reason.


Table of Contents



The BUILD framework

That realization is what eventually led me to call this pattern the BUILD Framework. Not because it is a shortcut to college admissions. It is not. And not because it can be reduced to a checklist. It cannot. I call it the BUILD Framework because it reflects the mindset I have repeatedly seen in students who create work that actually matters. Students who do not just try to look impressive, but who become genuinely interesting because they are building something meaningful. Jump to What is BUILD?



Students who inspired the framework


  • One of the students who helped me understand this was Said Azaizah. If you looked only at the outcome, you might say that he built a Context Generator and later earned admission to MIT. But that would miss the real story. What made him memorable was not just the technology he created. It was the purpose behind it. Every conversation with him seemed to circle back to the people he cared about and the problems he wanted to solve. He was not chasing a project simply to add a line to an application. He already cared deeply about helping the community around him, and technology became a way for him to express that care. Watching him work reminded me that the strongest students do not begin with a project. They begin with a purpose.


  • Then there was Saanvi, whose journey taught me something just as important. Her strength was not that she arrived with a grand mission statement or a polished idea. Her strength was curiosity. She noticed things other people overlooked. She paid attention to small inefficiencies in everyday life, especially in the context of warehouse operations and the workers within them. Most students would have heard the problem and moved on. Saanvi kept asking questions. Why does this happen? What causes the bottleneck? Could data help? Could AI improve the process? What would a better system look like? That curiosity eventually became a project, but what mattered most was the way she approached the world. She did not wait for answers. She followed the questions until they led her somewhere meaningful.

  • Alexei Manuel taught me something different again. Long before college admissions entered the picture, he was already deeply interested in biology and chemistry. But what made that interest powerful was not just the subject itself. It was the reason behind it. He was not drawn to science because it looked impressive. He was drawn to what science could do. The discoveries. The breakthroughs. The possibility of improving human life. Research was never the destination for him. It was the tool. The mission came first, and that mission shaped the choices he made long before Cornell ever accepted him.



What is BUILD & how to practice it?


After enough years of watching students like these, I began to notice a pattern I could not ignore.


Different backgrounds. Different strengths. Different goals. Different universities.


Yet the same underlying mindset kept showing up again and again. It was not forced. It was not manufactured. It was simply natural.


That is where BUILD comes from.

Five-panel BUILD infographic with glowing hands, faces, network, puzzle pieces, and arrow in orange on black, with large text.

The first letter: B


B is for Believe in a Problem. Every exceptional student starts by caring about something. A gap in the world that feels worth closing. Some students care about medicine because they have seen how deeply it affects families. Some care about climate because they have watched the world around them change. Some care about education because they have seen people struggle to access support. The exact problem does not matter as much as the sincerity behind it. The best students do not need a perfect idea on day one. They need a problem they genuinely care about.


The second letter: U


U is for Understand the People. This is where many projects become real. The strongest work is never just technical. It is human. Before exceptional students build anything meaningful, they take time to understand who is experiencing the problem and why it matters. They ask who is struggling, who benefits if this improves, and what changes if the problem gets solved. That human lens changes everything. When students keep people at the center, their work becomes more thoughtful, more useful, and often more powerful than they expected.


The third letter: I


I is for Invest in Curiosity. Curiosity is one of the most underrated advantages a student can have. The students who grow the fastest are not necessarily the ones who know the most at the beginning. They are the ones who keep asking better questions. They do not stop at surface-level understanding. They dig deeper, test ideas, explore alternatives, and come back with new questions. Saanvi’s project did not begin with expertise. It began with curiosity. And over time, curiosity became capability. That is one of the most important transformations I see in students: the moment they stop waiting to feel ready and start learning by doing.


The fourth letter: L


L is for Lead Through Contribution. The strongest students do not ask only what they can get from an opportunity. They ask what they can create, improve, or contribute. That shift may sound small, but it changes the way students show up. It changes how they approach a project. It changes how they think about teamwork. It changes how they define success. Contribution creates ownership. Ownership creates motivation. And motivation creates growth. The students who lead through contribution often become the ones others naturally trust, because they are not just present. They are useful.


The fifth letter: D


D is for Develop Relentlessly. Every meaningful project goes through moments that are frustrating, messy, and uncertain. Ideas fail. Models break. Experiments do not work. Progress slows down. There are moments when a student wonders whether the entire thing is worth continuing. That part of the process is never glamorous, but it is where growth actually happens. The students who ultimately achieve the most are not the ones who avoid obstacles. They are the ones who keep developing anyway. They revise. They improve. They persist. They return to the work after it has disappointed them. In the long run, consistency matters far more than talent alone.



Conclusion


One of the biggest misconceptions I see students carry is the belief that strong applicants are constantly optimizing for college admissions. In reality, the strongest applicants are usually optimizing for impact. Admissions officers simply notice the result.


When students focus on solving meaningful problems, helping people, exploring genuine interests, and steadily improving their work, they naturally create stronger stories. Their application becomes evidence of who they have become, not just a collection of activities they completed for the sake of appearing accomplished. That difference matters.


And that is why I keep coming back to the BUILD Framework. It is not a formula. It is not a trick. It is a pattern I have seen in students who create meaningful work and, in the process, become stronger thinkers, better builders, and more grounded human beings.

If you are a student preparing to begin an AI program, a research project, or any kind of hands-on learning experience, I hope you remember this: do not start by asking what will look impressive. Start by asking what matters to you.


Because the students who build the most impressive projects are rarely trying to impress anyone.

And that is what the BUILD Framework is really about.

Believe in a problem. Understand the people. Invest in curiosity. Lead through contribution. Develop relentlessly.

In my experience, that is not just a framework for stronger projects.

It is a framework for becoming the kind of person who creates meaningful impact long after college admissions are over.


Check out projects our students build at BetterMind Labs

Comments


bottom of page